Prediction of Ethan Quinn [126th] vs Paul Jubb [236th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead To Head: Quinn 1 - 0 Jubb
They have played 2 sets in total, with Quinn winning 2 and Jubb winning 0. The last match between Quinn and Jubb was at the Canberra Challenger, 29-12-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Ethan Quinn getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ethan Quinn | 1 |
Paul Jubb | 0 |
Quinn | Stats | Jubb |
---|---|---|
67% (22-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-7) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
126 | Ranking | 236 |
123 | Highest Rank | 180 |
21 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | R |
4 | Titles | 10 |
58% (110-79) | Career Total W/L | 67% (218-107) |
$334,310 | Career Prize Money | $159,460 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:52:38 | Average Match Time | 1:52:38 |
61% (48/79) | 1st Serve % | 63% (42/67) |
71% (34/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (30/42) |
58% (18/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
37% (25/67) | Return Points Win % | 34% (27/79) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ethan Quinn vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Quinn 1 - 0 Jubb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Quinn has won 47.41% of points on their second serve, while Jubb has won 46.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Quinn, in recent form, has won 45.69% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 41.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.22% and 23.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Quinn has saved 53.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 56.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Quinn has won 57.5% of matches played (W/L 46/ 34), with Jubb winning 52.83% (W/L 28/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Quinn has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 27/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 73% (W/L 51/ 19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 18/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Quinn has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 28/ 21), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.16% of matches (W/L 14/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Quinn winning 1 times and Jubb being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Quinn winning 2 and Jubb winning 0. The last match between Quinn and Jubb was at the Canberra Challenger, 29-12-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Ethan Quinn getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Quinn and Jubb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Quinn winning 0 times and Jubb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Quinn winning 1, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Quinn has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.24 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 213.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Quinn has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Quinn has converted 26.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 26.42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ethan Quinn Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Ethan Quinn
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Borna Coric
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Corentin Moutet
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Colton Smith
Player
Ethan Quinn
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Jordan Thompson
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Adrian Mannarino
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ethan Quinn
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Gabriel Diallo
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacopo Vasami
Player
Paul Jubb
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michael Geerts
Player
Paul Jubb
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Franco Agamenone
Player
Paul Jubb
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Adrien Gobat
Player
Paul Jubb
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Paul Jubb
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ethan Quinn
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mark Lajal
Player
Paul Jubb
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Chris Rodesch
Player
Paul Jubb
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
11
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
41 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Paul Jubb
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Quinn vs Jubb?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Quinn Vs Jubb is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (110/79) | Win/Loss | 67% (218/107) |
55% (248/200) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (485/271) |
52% (2311/2132) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3979/3212) |
0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
894 | Aces Total | 1033 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
506 | Total Double Faults | 945 |
1:47:31 | Average Match Time | 1:35:38 |
227.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.46 |
60% (8242/13762) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13104/21036) |
71% (5852/8242) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (9141/13104) |
51% (2792/5520) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4159/7932) |
40% (507/1272) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (971/2325) |
39% (5281/13702) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9064/21872) |
59% (109/186) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (215/316) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
54% (41/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (62/106) |
59% (42/71) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (56/103) |
87% (106/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (214/192) |
13% (106/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (214/21) |
22% (83/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (111/26) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...